Office of the Ombudsperson for Academic Ethics and Procedures

Founding year

2013

History

Particular concern about academic ethics in Lithuanian academia was addressed in 2009 by the national decision to establish an Office of Ombudsperson for Academic Ethics and Procedures (Office). The decision was taken during the approval of the revised Law on Higher Education and Research by the Parliament of Lithuania (Seimas). However, the Office began to function at full extent a few years later, in 2013, when the first ombudsperson was appointed by Seimas.

Initially, the Office has been assisted by the Advisory Board composed of delegates from diverse stakeholders, such as Research Council of Lithuania, Lithuanian University Rectors’ University, Lithuanian Association of Junior Researchers, Lithuanian Bar Association, and others. Later, the Office has started to set up different working groups that are invited to share expertise in particular cases (e.g. issue-specific guidelines development) and help to improve academic practices. In addition to this, the Office invites individual experts to find out the scale and type of academic malpractice.

The team of the Office is composed of employees contracted as public officers (e.g. advisors and senior specialists for public administration) and as regular employees (e.g. senior specialists for technical assistance). Public officers’ educational background is law.

ENRIO member since

2019

Structure

The Office is an independent not-for-profit public body that is responsible to Seimas.

Main Tasks

The Office, part of a national higher education and research system, is co-involved in the higher education and research policy implementation. It contributes to the development of the higher education and research quality through diverse activities, such as handling the alleged violations of academic ethics and/or procedures, having roundtable discussions with academia and other stakeholders, developing recommendations, carrying out analytical overviews. In addition to this, the Office further envisages to strengthen prevention-related activities, e.g. to develop issue-specific guidelines and organise training for academia.

Investigation

The investigation of an alleged violation of academic ethics and/or procedures begins with the reception of a complaint and/or evidence. At the initial stage, a preliminary investigation encompasses an analysis of the information/evidence obtained and consideration of prospective actions. If the Office decides that there are no grounds for initiating an investigation (e.g. due to kind of malpractice), the case might be forwarded to a higher education and research institution for self-regulation purposes or to a related public body or refused to investigate. If the Office decides to proceed further with the investigation, details of an alleged violation are specified and the communication with affected stakeholders is initiated. Decision of the ombudsperson might be of different nature: s/he concludes to terminate the investigation because of the absence of supportive evidence, declare the complaint as unfounded or acknowledge the violation of academic ethics and/or procedures. After the decision is taken, the Office informs the parties involved as well as the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport and, where relevant, Research Council of Lithuania. In addition to this, the ombudsperson might provide recommendations to further certain improvements in higher education and research institutions. Afterwards the ombudsperson monitors the implementation of these recommendations and finds out difficulties that higher education and research institutions face while implementing them.

Any decision of the ombudsperson might be appealed following administrative proceedings within a month after publicizing the decision. The court might remain the Ombudsperson’s decision in force at partial or full extent as well as make it null.

workflow chart

Training

The practice of trainings started in 2019 and it is mostly based on the demand of higher education and research institutions. The Office annually delivers at least 10 training sessions. In addition to this, the Office annually organises the conference to academia.

Promoting Research Integrity

The promotion of research integrity as a part of academic ethics is one of the major Office’s activities. Anonymised decisions in Lithuanian are publicized on the Office website.

In addition to this, the Office develops diverse guidelines related to academic and research integrity.

Contact

Dr. Reda Cimmperman

Ombudswoman
+370 694 43992

Research Council of Lithuania

Founding year

1991

History

Research Council of Lithuania (RCL) is the governmental institution responsible for implementing research and development (R&D) policy in Lithuania. Acting as an independent advisory body for the Lithuanian Government (Government), the RCL provides expert guidance to the Government and other national decision-makers on matters related to research policy.

RCL’s mission is to promote Lithuania’s competitive participation in the global creation of knowledge. In this regard, the RCL’s activities are centred around three core domains: R&D funding, the formulation of research policy, and the research quality (encompassing research ethics and integrity). The RCL administers national research programmes, oversees competitive funding for research projects, and fosters innovation across various fields of sciences. It is also responsible for setting national research priorities and implementing relevant strategies. Responsible conduct of research is paramount to ensure in the RCL’s operations.

In line with its Statutes, the RCL adheres to the principles of transparency, objectivity, impartiality, non-discrimination, and equal opportunities, while taking all necessary measures to ensure compliance with the principles of research ethics (that also includes research integrity).

ENRIO member since

2025

Structure

The RCL is composed of a Board, a Chairperson, a Vice-Chairperson, three Expert Committees – the Expert Committee on Humanities and Social Sciences, the Expert Committee on Natural and Technical Sciences, the Committee for Research and Higher Education Policy, and an Administration.
In the RCL’s structure, the Research Ethics Committee (REC) was established in 2012.

Main Tasks

The REC fulfils the following responsibilities:

  • Carry out an initial screening of complaints on alleged research malpractices in research proposals, research projects and reports, and institutional assessments of research outputs.
  • Examine legislative initiatives and proposition of legislative improvements/ amendments to promote research ethics in a broad sense.
  • Advise the Chairperson of the RCL and submit proposals on ethical issues related to research activity and dissemination.

Investigation

The REC carries out an initial screening of complaints on alleged research malpractices in research proposals, research projects and reports, and institutional assessments of research outputs and concludes with one of the following courses of action:

  • Propose that the Chairperson of the RCL refers the matter to the relevant authority or authorities for further action.
  • Propose to the Chairperson of the RCL that the complaint should not be considered further and that the whistleblower should be informed of this in writing.
  • Propose that the Chairperson of the RCL adopts a decision on legislation.

Training

The RCL provides its staff with professional development opportunities, including training on management of private interests, open science practices, and the risks associated with artificial intelligence.

Promoting Research Integrity

The RCL engages in the promotion of research integrity using different outlets. At the national level, it promotes research integrity as part of open science foremost (e.g. Guidelines for Open Access to Research Publications and Research Data (2016), Description of the Procedure for Open Access to the R&D Outputs (2024)). Currently, the RCL is developing the Code of Conduct for Researchers.
The RCL also uses its expertise to help monitor how the UNESCO Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers (2017) is implemented nationally, and it offers suggestions for other UNESCO initiatives.

Contact

Dr. Loreta Tauginienė

Chairwoman of Research Ethics Committee

Research Council of Lithuania
Gedimino pr. 3
LT-01103 Vilnius – Lithuania